'Clear all GroupID ChkBoxes including the CB selected (ensure only one CB in group is selected). StrSequenceID = UCase(Right(oFF.Name, 1)) StrTemp = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ" 'Permits up to 26 checkboxes per group If you use form fields frequently see my: Add Classic Form Controls In Word 2007/2010 the form field controls are at Developer tab>Controls>Legacy Forms. It is wholly functional with Word 2007/2010.Ģ. This tips page, illustrations and examples were developed using Word 2003.
Form fields in word 2016 windows#
When you open a Form Field Options dialog box, notice the two windows labeled “Run Macro on” “Entry” and “Exit." These and the macros they designate are key collaborators in controlling form field behavior.
Form fields in word 2016 how to#
See: Installing Macros for instructions on how to set up and use the macros provided in this Microsoft Word Help & Microsoft Word Tips page. Thanks to Charles Kenyon for having a list of field functions, which is where I found this solution. To unlock ALL fields in the document, press Ctrl+A to select everything, then press Ctrl+Shit+F11 to unlock all the fields.Press Ctrl+Shift+F11 on the locked field to unlock it.The fix (test on a copy of your document first): It did! Next, I tested (on a COPY of the document, as always) to see if I could select the entire document and apply the fix to ALL fields in the document-that worked too! Immediately all the fields in the document were now updatable. I had no idea you could even lock fields (or why you’d want to), but I figured I’d try unlocking one of the fields using the method described to see if it worked.
Form fields in word 2016 update#
Off to Google… where I found that if the fields are locked (who knew?) then you get a grayed out Update Field option. I’d never seen that before, so I tried a few more with the same result-I couldn’t update a cross-reference! I thought I’d just try updating one of these cross-referenced fields, but when I selected it and right-clicked, Update Field was grayed out (greyed out). But why wasn’t the cross-reference showing as 3 instead of 3.0? When I Ctrl+clicked on a 3.0 cross-reference (for example) it went to the correct place. for the numbered Heading 1 style, whereas the new template I’d transferred this document to used 3, 4, etc. But what told me definitively that something wasn’t right was that old template used 3.0, 4.0 etc. That in itself was a little unusual especially as I’d redone the Appendix headings, so the original cross-references to them should have broken.
On this document I fully expected several of them, but there were none. I’d assumed all the cross-referenced fields in the document had also updated and did my usual check for ‘Error!’ to find anything that broke during the update. In a recent document I was editing, I could update the TOC, list of figures/tables, and the fields in the headers/footers using one or more of the usual methods (switch to Print Preview view then back to Print Layout F9 right-click and select Update Field update table of contents command etc.). And I usually ‘find’ the thing that I didn’t know existed because I’ve come across something in a document that I can’t solve and have to investigate (search Google) to find the cause and the solution. I’ve been using Microsoft Word for Windows since about Word 2.0 (yes, more than two decades…) but sometimes it still stops me in my tracks with something I didn’t know existed.
0 kommentar(er)
